Current:Home > ScamsArkansas cannot prevent 2 teachers from discussing critical race theory in classroom, judge rules-LoTradeCoin
Arkansas cannot prevent 2 teachers from discussing critical race theory in classroom, judge rules
View Date:2024-12-23 20:39:35
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A federal judge has ruled Arkansas cannot prevent two high school teachers from discussing critical race theory in the classroom, but he stopped short of more broadly blocking the state from enforcing its ban on “indoctrination” in public schools.
U.S. District Judge Lee Rudofsky issued a narrow preliminary injunction Tuesday evening against the ban, one of several changes adopted under an education overhaul that Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law last year.
The prohibition is being challenged by two teachers and two students at Little Rock Central High School, site of the 1957 desegregation crisis.
In his 50-page ruling, Rudofsky said the state’s arguments make it clear the law doesn’t outright “prevent classroom instruction that teaches, uses, or refers to any theory, idea, or ideology.”
His ruling prohibited the state from disciplining the teachers for teaching, mentioning or discussing critical race theory — an academic framework dating to the 1970s that centers on the idea that racism is embedded in the nation’s institution. The theory is not a fixture of K-12 education, and Arkansas’ ban does not define what constitutes critical race theory.
Rudofsky said although his ruling was narrow, it “should give comfort to teachers across the state (and to their students) that Section 16 does not prohibit teachers from teaching about, using, or referring to critical race theory or any other theory, ideology, or idea so long as the teachers do not compel their students to accept as valid such theory, ideology, or idea.”
Rudofsky said his decision still would bar the teachers from taking steps such as grading on the basis on whether a student accepts or rejects a theory or giving preferential treatment to students on whether they accept a theory.
Both the state and attorneys for the teachers claimed the ruling as an initial victory in ongoing litigation over the law.
“We are very happy that the court has acknowledged that the plaintiffs have brought colorable constitutional claims forward,” said Mike Laux, an attorney for the teachers and students who filed suit. “With this notch in our belt, we look forward to prosecuting this incredibly important case going forward.”
David Hinojosa, director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — also representing the plaintiffs in the case — said the ruling “has essentially gutted Arkansas’ classroom censorship law to render the law virtually meaningless.”
Republican Attorney General Tim Griffin said the ruling “merely prohibits doing what Arkansas was never doing in the first place.”
“Today’s decision confirms what I’ve said all along. Arkansas law doesn’t prohibit teaching the history of segregation, the civil rights movement, or slavery,” Griffin said in a statement.
The lawsuit stems from the state’s decision that an Advanced Placement course on African American Studies would not count toward state credit during the 2023-2024 school year. The teachers’ lawsuit argues the state’s ban is so vague that it forces them to self-censor what they teach to avoid running afoul of it.
Arkansas is among several Republican-led states that have placed restrictions on how race is taught in the classroom, including prohibitions on critical race theory. Tennessee educators filed a similar lawsuit last year challenging that state’s sweeping bans on teaching certain concepts of race, gender and bias in classroom.
veryGood! (51)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Something Corporate
- California supervisor who tried to get rid of Shasta County vote-counting machines survives recall
- What are the IRS tax brackets? What are the new federal tax brackets for 2023? Answers here
- Are these killer whales actually two separate species? New research calls for distinction
- Will Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul end in KO? Boxers handle question differently
- Video shows first Neuralink brain chip patient playing chess by moving cursor with thoughts
- Older Florida couple found slain in their home; police believe killer stole their car
- Man in Scream-Like Mask Allegedly Killed Neighbor With Chainsaw and Knife in Pennsylvania
- Tua Tagovailoa playing with confidence as Miami Dolphins hope MNF win can spark run
- Building a new Key Bridge could take years and cost at least $400 million, experts say
Ranking
- Should Georgia bench Carson Beck with CFP at stake against Tennessee? That's not happening
- Appeals panel won’t order North Carolina Senate redistricting lines to be redrawn
- Baltimore bridge collapse is port's version of global pandemic: It's almost scary how quiet it is
- No, NASA doesn't certify solar eclipse glasses. Don't trust products that claim otherwise
- Federal judge denies request to block measure revoking Arkansas casino license
- Network political contributors have a long history. But are they more trouble than they’re worth?
- Here's how much you have to make to afford a starter home in the U.S.
- 2024 Masters field: Jon Rahm, Scottie Scheffler, Tiger Woods lead loaded group
Recommendation
-
Women suing over Idaho’s abortion ban describe dangerous pregnancies, becoming ‘medical refugees’
-
Women's college basketball coaches in the Sweet 16 who have earned tournament bonuses
-
John Harrison: Exploring multiple perspectives on artificial intelligence
-
Father, 4-year-old son drown in suspected overnight fishing accident near Tennessee River
-
Beyoncé's Grammy nominations in country categories aren't the first to blur genre lines
-
'Ernie Hudson doesn't age': Fans gush over 78-year-old 'Ghostbusters' star
-
Writer Percival Everett: In ownership of language there resides great power
-
Baltimore bridge collapse puts the highly specialized role of ship’s pilot under the spotlight